A weekly TV news magazine engaging America on the critical energy issues of the day.

Viewpoint

Some environmental groups are quesy about wind power development, but in a peer-reviewed study of the industry’s outlook and impact in Kansas, the Nature Conservancy chapter there concludes that “risks to wildlife from wind energy may be alleviated through proper siting and mitigation offsets.”

The researchers focused on protecting “key habitats (intact grasslands and playas); umbrella species (greater and lesser prairie-chickens); imperiled species (whooping crane); and areas of wildlife congregation for taxa that may be particularly vulnerable to wind energy impacts (bat roosts and playas).” They found that some areas would have to be completely avoided, but wind power could proceed in others areas without issue, and in still others if “offset projects” were undertaken to make up for the ecological impact of the development.

kansas wind power wildlife impact

image via PLoS One

According to the study, “conservation goals” could be met while putting to use 10.3 million hectares (ha) of Kansas – 48 percent of the state – for wind power generating. That would potentially yield 478 gigawatts (GW) of wind power capacity.

Even narrowing the focus to the 2.7 million ha that would require no compensatory mitigation could produce 125 GW of capacity – “1,648 percent higher than the level of wind development needed in Kansas by 2030 if the United States is to get 20 percent of its electricity from wind.”

The researchers proposed that projects that either avoid or offset impacts in line with the study could be given “Green Certification.” This, the authors said, “may help to expand and sustain the wind industry by facilitating the completion of individual projects sited to avoid sensitive areas and protecting the industry’s reputation as an ecologically friendly source of electricity.”

The study said wind power’s threats to wildlife include direct mortality to birds and bats as well as habit loss and fragmentation. It cited the case of the 150-MW Elk River Wind Project, near Beaumont, Kansas. There, it said, nearly 20 miles of new, improved roads (pictured above) were built across native tallgrass prairie to service the plant, “restricting movement for many animals, possibly leading to population level impacts and genetic effects.”

u.s. wind energy map

image via NREL

According to the latest quarterly report [PDF] from the American Wind Energy Association, Kansas is 14th in the United States in installed wind power capacity, with 1,074 MW, but government data indicates that it has vast potential, along with most of the U.S. Great Plains (see map above).

The full Kansas study, “Development by Design: Mitigating Wind Development’s Impacts on Wildlife in Kansas,” is available at the open-source peer-reviewed science site PLoS One.

 

 

 

 

 

This is a cross-post from EarthTechling.com

 

EarthTechling is an online consumer publication focused on all things green technology. From clean energy and electric vehicles to green gadgets and green buildings, our passionate team and readers weigh in on the latest green news, services, and products. 

 

Original Post: http://www.earthtechling.com/2011/11/can-wind-power-wildlife-get-along/

What's New

What's New

106 U.S. Coal Plant Retirements Since 2010

Last Wednesday was a big milestone for people who care about public health and a livable climate. Two utilities announced the planned closure of nine coal plants.

Read more ...
World’s Oldest Nuclear Power Plant Shuts Down Today

Today, in the UK, the world's oldest nuclear power plant shut down.

Read more ...
Shocker! California Tops US Renewables List

The U.S. led the world in clean energy investment in 2011, but China retained the top spot in the latest Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index from Ernst & Young.

Read more ...
Morning News Roundup – February 29, 2012

Today's morning news roundup - all the energy and climate coverage you need to read.

Read more ...